<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Sonic Boom: Critical Masses</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/10/07/sonic-boom-critical-masses/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/10/07/sonic-boom-critical-masses/</link>
	<description>Serving the opinion leaders of Long Island</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:30:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: bambam</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/10/07/sonic-boom-critical-masses/comment-page-1/#comment-4523</link>
		<dc:creator>bambam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:20:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=38575#comment-4523</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[what i like about pitchfork reviews is, they steer me towards the good quality stuff in the genres i like.  sure they have a reputation for being snobby, but even when we get a classic, like the recent animal collective record, the gushing is kept at a minimum.  there are certain clue words and phrases in each review for me, so that even if it isn&#039;t the best review, i might still go check the artist out, and might still like the release.  cluewords for me are mbv, 4ad, gbv, pixies.  if they say &quot;mbv&quot; in a review, no matter how bad the rating, it&#039;s an automatic buy for me.  most importantly, pitchfork helps steer me towards new genres i would never seek out on my own, and they do all the digging for me since radio and mtv have been dead since long before pitchfork existed.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what i like about pitchfork reviews is, they steer me towards the good quality stuff in the genres i like.  sure they have a reputation for being snobby, but even when we get a classic, like the recent animal collective record, the gushing is kept at a minimum.  there are certain clue words and phrases in each review for me, so that even if it isn&#8217;t the best review, i might still go check the artist out, and might still like the release.  cluewords for me are mbv, 4ad, gbv, pixies.  if they say &#8220;mbv&#8221; in a review, no matter how bad the rating, it&#8217;s an automatic buy for me.  most importantly, pitchfork helps steer me towards new genres i would never seek out on my own, and they do all the digging for me since radio and mtv have been dead since long before pitchfork existed.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 313/318 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: archive.longislandpress.com @ 2013-05-23 01:46:53 by W3 Total Cache -->