<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Steering You Wrong</title>
	<atom:link href="http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/</link>
	<description>Serving the opinion leaders of Long Island</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 28 Oct 2012 12:30:37 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: teena</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-3232</link>
		<dc:creator>teena</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 04 Sep 2009 14:18:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-3232</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Jeff A 
he is right you have absolutely no idea about what you are talking about i work in an auto body shop and the things that go on with the insurance companies are ridiculus they are the ones that are trying to rob people the try to do this to hard working honest shop that are trying to make it by... so go check yourself before you start talking about a subject and look like a fool]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jeff A<br />
he is right you have absolutely no idea about what you are talking about i work in an auto body shop and the things that go on with the insurance companies are ridiculus they are the ones that are trying to rob people the try to do this to hard working honest shop that are trying to make it by&#8230; so go check yourself before you start talking about a subject and look like a fool</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-1682</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:17:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-1682</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I just have to say to you Maryanne...you are nuts! Estimators train in a class given by their insurance co. employer. Most....MOST do not have shop experience! I had a female adjustor come out one day from state farm and ask me to get under the car to write the estimate because her skirt was too short! UGH! What kind of experience do you think she had here in central florida? Experience???? Not in the AUTO body shop!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just have to say to you Maryanne&#8230;you are nuts! Estimators train in a class given by their insurance co. employer. Most&#8230;.MOST do not have shop experience! I had a female adjustor come out one day from state farm and ask me to get under the car to write the estimate because her skirt was too short! UGH! What kind of experience do you think she had here in central florida? Experience???? Not in the AUTO body shop!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: me</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-1681</link>
		<dc:creator>me</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 29 Jul 2009 21:10:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-1681</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No...State Farm is worse than geico]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No&#8230;State Farm is worse than geico</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGuy</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-584</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:08:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-584</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This does not suprise me. My shop used to see 8-10% of it&#039;s volume as Geico work. (we are not a Geico DRP) since the new RX shop went in down the road, I have seen maybe 5 all year. 
Someday this be the demis of Geico I hope. They are one of the worst for sure.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This does not suprise me. My shop used to see 8-10% of it&#8217;s volume as Geico work. (we are not a Geico DRP) since the new RX shop went in down the road, I have seen maybe 5 all year.<br />
Someday this be the demis of Geico I hope. They are one of the worst for sure.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGuy</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-583</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 16:06:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-583</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No no they were not ever until just recently. I have been in the industry 15 years now and this just within the last two years became an issue.
Anyone who knows the body shop side knows we do not make money on blends. They are simply to make the color match but money is not made there. So why on earth do you think we would still be arguing for them? I&#039;ll tell you because we need them to properly match color.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No no they were not ever until just recently. I have been in the industry 15 years now and this just within the last two years became an issue.<br />
Anyone who knows the body shop side knows we do not make money on blends. They are simply to make the color match but money is not made there. So why on earth do you think we would still be arguing for them? I&#8217;ll tell you because we need them to properly match color.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miss Anyomous</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-565</link>
		<dc:creator>Miss Anyomous</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 10 Jul 2009 01:24:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-565</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been an employee of GEICO for some several years.  I am still currently employed as a claims associate.  I completely agree with the fact that we at GEICO are steering our clients into these ARX shops. The reason for the steering is because we are penalized if we do not &quot; book the appointments &quot; and  if the customer does not get their vehicle fixed  at the ARX.  We are placed on verbal and written warning, which could lead to termination if we do not book appointments at the ARX.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been an employee of GEICO for some several years.  I am still currently employed as a claims associate.  I completely agree with the fact that we at GEICO are steering our clients into these ARX shops. The reason for the steering is because we are penalized if we do not &#8221; book the appointments &#8221; and  if the customer does not get their vehicle fixed  at the ARX.  We are placed on verbal and written warning, which could lead to termination if we do not book appointments at the ARX.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGuy</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-451</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 15:38:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-451</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maryanne,
It is rare that those blends are questionable, very rare. You may feel they are because you have been brainwashed by an insurance company?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maryanne,<br />
It is rare that those blends are questionable, very rare. You may feel they are because you have been brainwashed by an insurance company?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Have you been Duked?</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-429</link>
		<dc:creator>Have you been Duked?</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 06 Jul 2009 00:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-429</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Spread the word,   www.crashtalk.com  a great sorce of information!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Spread the word,   <a href="http://www.crashtalk.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.crashtalk.com</a>  a great sorce of information!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryanne</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-311</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 02 Jul 2009 12:21:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-311</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Blends on deck lids an hoods were always questionable anyway.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Blends on deck lids an hoods were always questionable anyway.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGuy</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-280</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:09:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-280</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[One more thing just happned today Nationwide is no longer paying for any color blends on solid colors and no blend on metallic for deck lids and hoods. 
This will make us look terrible. Customer comes to pick up car, color does not match, who do you think gets the blame?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>One more thing just happned today Nationwide is no longer paying for any color blends on solid colors and no blend on metallic for deck lids and hoods.<br />
This will make us look terrible. Customer comes to pick up car, color does not match, who do you think gets the blame?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ThatGuy</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-279</link>
		<dc:creator>ThatGuy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Jun 2009 19:06:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I would like to add DRP&#039;s are advertised as something good for the customer, but in reality they are good for the company not the customer. These DRP agreements lower the cost of repair with cost contracts and furthermore it allows the insurance company to lay more adjusters off, as they don&#039;t need them if they can steer the work to a DRP facility.  Make no mistake I am in business at this moment because of DRP&#039;s I have 6 of them, but every year the insurance companies tighten the rains a little more. It is now very difficult to make a profit and it&#039;s getting worse by the day.
I think if the nae sayers heard the conversations I have with insurance companies about low quality parts we are forced to use and other parts we are forced to repair that should have been replaced they would change their tune a whole lot. 
It seams that when ever a insurance company needs to increase it&#039;s profit margin the first place they start is the repair facility.  It&#039;s not fair were being run into the ground. It&#039;s time for them to look else were to cut cost.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would like to add DRP&#8217;s are advertised as something good for the customer, but in reality they are good for the company not the customer. These DRP agreements lower the cost of repair with cost contracts and furthermore it allows the insurance company to lay more adjusters off, as they don&#8217;t need them if they can steer the work to a DRP facility.  Make no mistake I am in business at this moment because of DRP&#8217;s I have 6 of them, but every year the insurance companies tighten the rains a little more. It is now very difficult to make a profit and it&#8217;s getting worse by the day.<br />
I think if the nae sayers heard the conversations I have with insurance companies about low quality parts we are forced to use and other parts we are forced to repair that should have been replaced they would change their tune a whole lot.<br />
It seams that when ever a insurance company needs to increase it&#8217;s profit margin the first place they start is the repair facility.  It&#8217;s not fair were being run into the ground. It&#8217;s time for them to look else were to cut cost.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-196</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 17:17:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-196</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maryann, 

The medical coverage side is a mess, I agree and it is getting worse.  At least on the auto side, we still have choices, as long as we are aware of that.  

Eileen, 

I couldn&#039;t agree with you more re fraudulent claims.  It is what drives up the cost of insurance and all of us pay for it in the long run.  Some people are just looking for the bid payout.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maryann, </p>
<p>The medical coverage side is a mess, I agree and it is getting worse.  At least on the auto side, we still have choices, as long as we are aware of that.  </p>
<p>Eileen, </p>
<p>I couldn&#8217;t agree with you more re fraudulent claims.  It is what drives up the cost of insurance and all of us pay for it in the long run.  Some people are just looking for the bid payout.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eileen Hagerman</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-187</link>
		<dc:creator>Eileen Hagerman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 14:09:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-187</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In response to last week’s cover article “Steering You Wrong”, I felt that I needed to respond. Like any industry, the insurance industry is not without its problems.  However, I did not feel that the article was a fair depiction of the industry as a whole. I worked for two insurance companies for over ten years. I did leave the industry several years ago because I myself had issues with it. However, if you want to paint a fair picture of  what is wrong with the industry,  look into the lucrative field of Personal &amp; Bodily Injury. The sheer volume of  questionable injury claims that are submitted to all insurance companies are largely to blame with why we pay such high premiums. It’s become common thinking to make a claim for a stiff neck, thinking that it’s an easy way to make a quick buck. 
I eventually left the field of insurance because of that perception. There is no quick money; we are all paying for those claims. If you want to expose insurance scams, be fair and look into frivolous and fraudulent lawsuits.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In response to last week’s cover article “Steering You Wrong”, I felt that I needed to respond. Like any industry, the insurance industry is not without its problems.  However, I did not feel that the article was a fair depiction of the industry as a whole. I worked for two insurance companies for over ten years. I did leave the industry several years ago because I myself had issues with it. However, if you want to paint a fair picture of  what is wrong with the industry,  look into the lucrative field of Personal &amp; Bodily Injury. The sheer volume of  questionable injury claims that are submitted to all insurance companies are largely to blame with why we pay such high premiums. It’s become common thinking to make a claim for a stiff neck, thinking that it’s an easy way to make a quick buck.<br />
I eventually left the field of insurance because of that perception. There is no quick money; we are all paying for those claims. If you want to expose insurance scams, be fair and look into frivolous and fraudulent lawsuits.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryanne</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-186</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 13:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-186</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I agree Rose, educating the customer would be beneficial.  Wait till you see what goes on with the medical coverage side of the policy, lots more complication there as well as to what is covered and what is not.

I believe that all of us a consumers need to be more responsible when we purchase policies, take the time to look at it, ask questions and be more self-reliant in educating ourselves.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree Rose, educating the customer would be beneficial.  Wait till you see what goes on with the medical coverage side of the policy, lots more complication there as well as to what is covered and what is not.</p>
<p>I believe that all of us a consumers need to be more responsible when we purchase policies, take the time to look at it, ask questions and be more self-reliant in educating ourselves.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-178</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 26 Jun 2009 01:14:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-178</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Of course it would add more to the policy, that is understood.  The point I am trying to make is that the use of ANY parts be that OEM, used or aftermarket, should be discussed when the policy is bought, not when a consumer has an accident.  The choice shoud be the consumer&#039;s choice, not what the insurance company thinks that they should be made aware of.  Since we do work in different states, the use of aftermarket parts is up to the insurance companies in some states.  We try to inform the consumer which companies do not use aftermarket parts at all, which ones use them after one year, and so on.   Just like insurance companies make referrals, we do the same.  If a consumer chooses a lower priced policy that accepts aftermarket parts, then he is aware of the terms of his policy and there is no confusion.  The point is to avoid the confusion when an accident happens.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Of course it would add more to the policy, that is understood.  The point I am trying to make is that the use of ANY parts be that OEM, used or aftermarket, should be discussed when the policy is bought, not when a consumer has an accident.  The choice shoud be the consumer&#8217;s choice, not what the insurance company thinks that they should be made aware of.  Since we do work in different states, the use of aftermarket parts is up to the insurance companies in some states.  We try to inform the consumer which companies do not use aftermarket parts at all, which ones use them after one year, and so on.   Just like insurance companies make referrals, we do the same.  If a consumer chooses a lower priced policy that accepts aftermarket parts, then he is aware of the terms of his policy and there is no confusion.  The point is to avoid the confusion when an accident happens.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryanne</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-171</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 20:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-171</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The use of OEM, used and aftermarket parts based on year and mileage is set out by NYS reg 64, not the insurance companies.

Most people buying insurance policies want the lowest price, not the best coverage.  Some may choose a replacement parts policy but I bet most would not, it would add more to the price of the policy.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The use of OEM, used and aftermarket parts based on year and mileage is set out by NYS reg 64, not the insurance companies.</p>
<p>Most people buying insurance policies want the lowest price, not the best coverage.  Some may choose a replacement parts policy but I bet most would not, it would add more to the price of the policy.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-170</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 18:49:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-170</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Maryann, 

I am aware that the use of LKQ and aftermarket parts are a part of every policy.  Just as every policy is different, each insurance company has a different cutoff for the use of such parts.  Is it after the current model year, is it on all repairs?  There are hundreds of cars that are hit while still under warranty and the use of aftermarket parts voids their warranty.  That is when consumers find out they have the option of paying the difference for OEM parts or accepting the alternative.   How hard can it be for insurance agents to ask if they want  a replacement parts policy or not when they purchase a policy.  It is hard enough to gain a person&#039;s trust, and usually people trust that their agent is protecting their interests when they buy insurance because they don&#039;t understand all of the mumbo-jumbo in their policy.  I find it laughable that insurance companies pay millions of dollors for television commercials that are cute and presume to protect the policyholder.  If they would just use some of those millions to explain the above questions to them, instead of lulling them into a false sense of security, maybe people would trust their companies.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Maryann, </p>
<p>I am aware that the use of LKQ and aftermarket parts are a part of every policy.  Just as every policy is different, each insurance company has a different cutoff for the use of such parts.  Is it after the current model year, is it on all repairs?  There are hundreds of cars that are hit while still under warranty and the use of aftermarket parts voids their warranty.  That is when consumers find out they have the option of paying the difference for OEM parts or accepting the alternative.   How hard can it be for insurance agents to ask if they want  a replacement parts policy or not when they purchase a policy.  It is hard enough to gain a person&#8217;s trust, and usually people trust that their agent is protecting their interests when they buy insurance because they don&#8217;t understand all of the mumbo-jumbo in their policy.  I find it laughable that insurance companies pay millions of dollors for television commercials that are cute and presume to protect the policyholder.  If they would just use some of those millions to explain the above questions to them, instead of lulling them into a false sense of security, maybe people would trust their companies.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dale Roberts</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-2/#comment-162</link>
		<dc:creator>Dale Roberts</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 25 Jun 2009 01:23:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-162</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I&#039;ve been in the automotive repair industry for over 30 years. Two years ago I decided to convert one half of my building not being used into a body shop. So one side does auto repairs, the other body shop. Being new to the body shop business excited me with new dreams and desires. We are not a drp for any insurance company. Most of our business has come from long term auto repair customers, and word of mouth. After two years of fighting trying to keep our customer in our shop and not steered to a local drp, and having to accept $35 to $40 per hour labor when my auto repair shops get $85, I&#039;m about ready to throw in the towel and do something differant. 

My opinion is this: Unless ALL body shops stand and fight together, your fighting an army with a few boys and no way to win. Insurance companies do NOT have the right to set prices and control labor. Any auto repair shop must charge a minimum of 4 times their techs labor rate to be profitable. Ie: Labor cost should not exceed 25 to max 30% of revenue. Cost of goods is much higher in body shop business. Auto repir shops keep parts, supplies and labor cost at 47% or less to make a profit. My body shop runs about 62% parts, labor and supplies. What a differance, mostly due to labor rates being so much less in the body shop than repair shop. 

Busy drp shops are faced with having no work if they fight back, so what do they do for change? Most non drp shops the owner has done nothing more than buy himself a job taking all the risk. What do they do for change? Heck, I tried for one whole year to get information to become a drp for a couple of insurance companies, and no info could be found. No one would talk to us about any drp program or even provide a contact name and number.

Again, my opinion. Set up a dealers assocation for each state. Work at getting 60% plus in the association. Poll the shops for information regarding labor rates by each insurance company they drp for. Then allow the association to be the voice of the whole mandating higher labor rates and such. If you can&#039;t get 60% or greater to stand together as a voice, shut down and go get a job with less risk involved. In the end the pay will be about the same!

Good luck and God bless to all my fellow Body shop owners out their trying to make a decent living.

Sincerely,
Dale]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;ve been in the automotive repair industry for over 30 years. Two years ago I decided to convert one half of my building not being used into a body shop. So one side does auto repairs, the other body shop. Being new to the body shop business excited me with new dreams and desires. We are not a drp for any insurance company. Most of our business has come from long term auto repair customers, and word of mouth. After two years of fighting trying to keep our customer in our shop and not steered to a local drp, and having to accept $35 to $40 per hour labor when my auto repair shops get $85, I&#8217;m about ready to throw in the towel and do something differant. </p>
<p>My opinion is this: Unless ALL body shops stand and fight together, your fighting an army with a few boys and no way to win. Insurance companies do NOT have the right to set prices and control labor. Any auto repair shop must charge a minimum of 4 times their techs labor rate to be profitable. Ie: Labor cost should not exceed 25 to max 30% of revenue. Cost of goods is much higher in body shop business. Auto repir shops keep parts, supplies and labor cost at 47% or less to make a profit. My body shop runs about 62% parts, labor and supplies. What a differance, mostly due to labor rates being so much less in the body shop than repair shop. </p>
<p>Busy drp shops are faced with having no work if they fight back, so what do they do for change? Most non drp shops the owner has done nothing more than buy himself a job taking all the risk. What do they do for change? Heck, I tried for one whole year to get information to become a drp for a couple of insurance companies, and no info could be found. No one would talk to us about any drp program or even provide a contact name and number.</p>
<p>Again, my opinion. Set up a dealers assocation for each state. Work at getting 60% plus in the association. Poll the shops for information regarding labor rates by each insurance company they drp for. Then allow the association to be the voice of the whole mandating higher labor rates and such. If you can&#8217;t get 60% or greater to stand together as a voice, shut down and go get a job with less risk involved. In the end the pay will be about the same!</p>
<p>Good luck and God bless to all my fellow Body shop owners out their trying to make a decent living.</p>
<p>Sincerely,<br />
Dale</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Maryanne</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-160</link>
		<dc:creator>Maryanne</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 17:56:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[W Dailey - I don&#039;t believe I know nothing about the auto body business and I don&#039;t believe using phrases like &quot;insurance companies NEVER  do anything for the customer&quot; is fair.  Of course they must make a profit so they have their own interests in mind, but serving the customers&#039; best interest  IS in their best interest in order to retain customers, attract new business and be profitable.

A customer that believes they are forced to drive far from their home for an estimate is clearly being strong armed.  However, the fact that an insurance company has DRP&#039;s so far away from customers is a reflection of problems within that companies DRP process. They are always trying to expand and get more shops on board to make it more convenient for the customers.

From the customer&#039;s perspective, if they agree to bring their vehicle to a DRP and there is not one locally, then the ins company will tow it there at their own expense - what more could you ask for?  In most situations they will even tow it back again at their own expense!  How could this be bad for a customer?  The only reason this causes frustration is because we are oddly emotionally attached to our vehicles, we don&#039;t like them to be far from us. But once they are at a shop, what difference does it make if it&#039;s one mile away or 100 miles away if the customer has no additional expense?

And for Rose, I&#039;m not sure what part of the country you are in but I&#039;m in New York and the use aftermarket parts, OEM and used are all explained in every policy. The problem is that most of us don&#039;t read our policy and even if the average person did, they wouldn&#039;t know what in the heck it all means so there is definitely a major disconnect between what the consumer is buying and what they actually know that they are buying.  Insurance companies can&#039;t explain it all, and insurance brokers are even worse at understanding the policies.  If you&#039;re looking for someone to blame I don&#039;t think you&#039;ll find just one person or entity.  

NYS insurance laws are written the way they are for good reasons but they are too complicated for most of us to understand or even care to understand because we don&#039;t have the time.  Our health insurance policies are the same.  So is the tax code, we sign our income taxes, buy our health insurance and car insurance, homeowners policies, life insurance policies, mortgages (need i go on?) and don&#039;t even know what we are agreeing to most of the time.

This is the state of our country, regulation on top of regulation, meant in order to protect us.  My only solution is for each of us to become more aware, take the time to make more informed decisions and live more consciously.  Once you do you will find yourself saying NO to alot more of what we usually overlook as the &quot;norm&quot;.

Respectfully]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>W Dailey &#8211; I don&#8217;t believe I know nothing about the auto body business and I don&#8217;t believe using phrases like &#8220;insurance companies NEVER  do anything for the customer&#8221; is fair.  Of course they must make a profit so they have their own interests in mind, but serving the customers&#8217; best interest  IS in their best interest in order to retain customers, attract new business and be profitable.</p>
<p>A customer that believes they are forced to drive far from their home for an estimate is clearly being strong armed.  However, the fact that an insurance company has DRP&#8217;s so far away from customers is a reflection of problems within that companies DRP process. They are always trying to expand and get more shops on board to make it more convenient for the customers.</p>
<p>From the customer&#8217;s perspective, if they agree to bring their vehicle to a DRP and there is not one locally, then the ins company will tow it there at their own expense &#8211; what more could you ask for?  In most situations they will even tow it back again at their own expense!  How could this be bad for a customer?  The only reason this causes frustration is because we are oddly emotionally attached to our vehicles, we don&#8217;t like them to be far from us. But once they are at a shop, what difference does it make if it&#8217;s one mile away or 100 miles away if the customer has no additional expense?</p>
<p>And for Rose, I&#8217;m not sure what part of the country you are in but I&#8217;m in New York and the use aftermarket parts, OEM and used are all explained in every policy. The problem is that most of us don&#8217;t read our policy and even if the average person did, they wouldn&#8217;t know what in the heck it all means so there is definitely a major disconnect between what the consumer is buying and what they actually know that they are buying.  Insurance companies can&#8217;t explain it all, and insurance brokers are even worse at understanding the policies.  If you&#8217;re looking for someone to blame I don&#8217;t think you&#8217;ll find just one person or entity.  </p>
<p>NYS insurance laws are written the way they are for good reasons but they are too complicated for most of us to understand or even care to understand because we don&#8217;t have the time.  Our health insurance policies are the same.  So is the tax code, we sign our income taxes, buy our health insurance and car insurance, homeowners policies, life insurance policies, mortgages (need i go on?) and don&#8217;t even know what we are agreeing to most of the time.</p>
<p>This is the state of our country, regulation on top of regulation, meant in order to protect us.  My only solution is for each of us to become more aware, take the time to make more informed decisions and live more consciously.  Once you do you will find yourself saying NO to alot more of what we usually overlook as the &#8220;norm&#8221;.</p>
<p>Respectfully</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rose</title>
		<link>http://archive.longislandpress.com/2009/06/18/steering-you-wrong/comment-page-1/#comment-157</link>
		<dc:creator>Rose</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Jun 2009 11:20:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.longislandpress.com/?p=9781#comment-157</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Just a brief comment on the repair process.  When a consumer has an accident, this is usually the first time they ever hear the word &quot;aftermarket&quot; parts.  We as the repairer are forced to explain what aftermarket parts are and why they are used on a vehicle that could be a few months old.  Shouldn&#039;t it be the responsibility of the insurer to explain to their insured when they buy a policy that aftermarket parts may be used in the repair of their vehicle in the event of an accident?  Then they would have the choice to choose &quot;original equipment&quot; replacement parts and pay accordingly for the policy.  If enough information is given when the consumer buys a policy including their rights and responsibilities, then we wouldn&#039;t have half of the problems we have during the repair process.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just a brief comment on the repair process.  When a consumer has an accident, this is usually the first time they ever hear the word &#8220;aftermarket&#8221; parts.  We as the repairer are forced to explain what aftermarket parts are and why they are used on a vehicle that could be a few months old.  Shouldn&#8217;t it be the responsibility of the insurer to explain to their insured when they buy a policy that aftermarket parts may be used in the repair of their vehicle in the event of an accident?  Then they would have the choice to choose &#8220;original equipment&#8221; replacement parts and pay accordingly for the policy.  If enough information is given when the consumer buys a policy including their rights and responsibilities, then we wouldn&#8217;t have half of the problems we have during the repair process.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

<!-- Performance optimized by W3 Total Cache. Learn more: http://www.w3-edge.com/wordpress-plugins/

Page Caching using disk: enhanced
Object Caching 636/641 objects using disk: basic

 Served from: archive.longislandpress.com @ 2013-06-20 04:03:13 by W3 Total Cache -->